The nominations for the 2026 Oscars were announced on Thursday (Jan. 22), revealing that five contenders are up for the highest honor a piece of music written for film can receive: best original song.

As predicted by many (including Billboard awards editor Paul Grein), “Golden” from KPop Demon Hunters is nominated in the category after spending eight weeks at No. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100 and 18 weeks atop the Billboard Global 200. Performed by EJAE — who also cowrote the track — Audrey Nuna and REI AMI, the singing voices behind Netflix’s favorite fictional K-pop girl group, the uplifting track has had an unprecedented run on the charts and in pop culture for a song from an animated film.

But “Golden” is just one track from a music-focused film that’s in the running. The Delta Blues genre was the lifeblood of Ryan Coogler’s Sinners, from which “I Lied to You” — created by Raphael Saadiq and Ludwig Göransson — scored a best original song nod. Diane Warren: Relentless examines the career of legendary songwriter Diane Warren, who penned “Dear Me” for the doc and is now nominated in the category for a 17th time.

Viva Verdi!, a film about retired opera singers, also scored a song nomination thanks to Nicholas Pike’s composition “Sweet Dreams of Joy.” The only film in the category that isn’t explicitly about music in some capacity is Train Dreams, a period piece about the early industrialization of the United States. From its soundtrack, “Train Dreams” by industry vets Nick Cave and Bryce Dessner is in the running as well.

The academy certainly has a lot to think about leading up to the Oscars ceremony on March 15. But right now, Billboard wants to know who you think should take home the statuette.

Below, tell us who you think should win best original song this year by casting your vote in the poll.

Drake has filed his appeal after his lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) over Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us” was dismissed, arguing that the judge issued a “dangerous” ruling that rap can never be defamatory.

Drake’s case, filed last year, claimed that UMG defamed him by releasing Lamar’s chart-topping diss track, which tarred his arch-rival as a “certified pedophile.” But a federal judge ruled in October that fans wouldn’t think that insults during a rap beef were actual factual statements.

In his awaited appeal of that ruling on Wednesday, Drake’s lawyers say that’s actually exactly what listeners thought: “Millions of people understood [Not Like Us] to convey factual information, causing countless individuals around the globe to believe that Drake was a pedophile.”

To dismiss Drake’s case despite that reality, his lawyers say, the judge created an “unprecedented” and “dangerous” precedent: that statements in a rap track can never be considered defamatory.

“It is hard to imagine a statement more damaging to one’s reputation and safety than being labeled a ‘certified pedophile,’ which elicits intense vitriol, and can spur violent retaliation,” Drake’s attorney Michael J. Gottlieb writes. “The court’s rule brushes aside the risk of concrete reputational harms that can and here, did spill over into violence.”

The appeal marks the next chapter in a legal battle that stunned the music industry. Few expected a rapper to respond to a diss track with a lawsuit — a move that drew ridicule in the hip-hop world. Fewer still expected him to file it against UMG, his longtime label and the biggest music company in the world.

Lamar released “Not Like Us” in May 2024 as the knock-out punch in a series of bruising diss tracks from the two stars. The song was not only seen as a final rhetorical victory for Lamar, but also went on to become a chart-topping hit in its own right. The track won five Grammy Awards, including record and song of the year, and formed the centerpiece of Lamar’s Super Bowl halftime show.

Last January, Drake responded with litigation – claiming UMG had defamed him by boosting the track’s popularity, including through the use of bots and other nefarious marketing tactics. The lawsuit, which didn’t name Lamar himself as a defendant, alleged that UMG “waged a campaign” against its own artist to spread a “malicious narrative” about him.

But in October, Judge Jeannette Vargas dismissed the case. She said Kendrick’s insulting lyrics were the kind of “hyperbolic” opinions that cannot be considered defamatory because listeners would not think they were “sober” statements of fact that could be proven true or false.

“Although the accusation that plaintiff is a pedophile is certainly a serious one, the broader context of a heated rap battle, with incendiary language and offensive accusations hurled by both participants, would not incline the reasonable listener to believe that ‘Not Like Us’ imparts verifiable facts about plaintiff.”

In Wednesday’s appeal, Drake’s lawyers called that ruling “indefensible” – warning that it had ignored evidence that fans understood the song as a “factual indictment of Drake” and instead had issued “dangerous” new rule that rappers can’t be sued.

“If rap diss tracks cannot contain statements of fact, then they are inoculated from any liability for defamation no matter how direct and damaging the defamatory statements they contain,” his lawyers say. “This case illustrates that.”

Lawyers for UMG will file a response in the coming weeks. A spokesman for the company did not immediately return a request for comment on Thursday.