This August, Dead & Company will celebrate 60 years of Grateful Dead music with three massive concerts in San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park. Fans can reasonably assume – as they can with most major touring artists today – that the sound will be impeccable.

But six decades ago, when the Grateful Dead began gigging around that very same park, quality sound was far from a given. Audiences routinely endured terrible audio, and bands also struggled to parse the noise and play together. Modern cornerstones of concert production, from monitors to digital delay towers, had yet to be invented.

Related

The Grateful Dead didn’t just embrace new advancements in audio technology – as journalist and Deadhead Brian Anderson chronicles in his new book, Loud and Clear: The Grateful Dead’s Wall of Sound and the Quest for Audio Perfection, the revered band actively drove concert sound forward, creating many of today’s standards in the process.

Loud and Clear specifically tackles the first decade of the band’s history, from its Bay Area formation in 1965 to the Wall of Sound, the gargantuan sound system worth nearly $2 million in today’s dollars that it took on the road in 1974. During those years, the band and the cast of characters in its orbit – from an audiophile LSD chemist to hard-nosed roadies – continually iterated its sound system, introducing numerous innovations in service of creating a deeper performer-listener connection through quality sound. The pinnacle was the Wall of Sound, a technological marvel that towered behind the band and allowed each musician to manipulate their individual mixes in real time.

“I knew this was for a general audience,” says Anderson, who asked himself, “How do I make it digestible and explain this stuff in a way people are gonna understand?” The son of Deadheads – who saw the band repeatedly in this era and took him as a toddler to see the Dead at Alpine Valley in the late ‘80s – found the answer in those strong personalities within the Dead’s organization. Loud and Clear is as much a story about the Dead’s audio equipment as it is about the band’s musical philosophy and the way money, fame, and excess challenged it. 

“The wheels came very close to coming off,” Anderson says of the Dead in this era. The band took the Wall of Sound – which, when its almost 600 speakers were assembled, measured 60 feet long and more than three stories tall – on the road for nearly 40 shows in 1974, and the unprecedented production feat came close to bankrupting the Dead and tearing it apart. Plus, at a time with far fewer regulations, transporting, assembling, and disassembling the Wall came with plenty of risks for the (often inebriated) crew tasked with doing so; Loud and Clear’s at-times harrowing narrative includes broken arms, nearly-severed toes, falling equipment, electrocutions and flipped trucks. “It’s amazing that nobody bit it,” Anderson says.

The Dead ultimately carried many of the lessons of the Wall of Sound into the proceeding years – but after taking a hiatus in 1975, returned without the advanced system in 1976. “They somehow kept it together,” Anderson says, “but there was a collective sigh of relief at the end of 1974 when they’re like, ‘OK, you know what? Let’s take a break here.’”

The Grateful Dead

The Grateful Dead (L to R: Bill Kreutzmann, Jerry Garcia, Bob Weir, Phil Lesh) perform on May 25, 1974 at Santa Barbara Stadium in Santa Barbara, California with their Wall of Sound.

Ed Perlstein/Redferns/Getty Images

What inspired you to write a book not just about the Dead, but about such a specific topic and period?

I am the child of early Deadheads who both started seeing the band in the late ’60s and early ’70s in Chicago and the tri-state area. I grew up hearing them talk about the Wall of Sound and this system’s sonic clarity. They would talk about seeing the band perform with this massive assembly of gear behind them – and it’s called the Wall of Sound, so it’s just captivated me my entire life.

As time went on, I grew to appreciate the scale of the Wall. When I was at VICE, I was the Features Editor [at science and tech vertical Motherboard], and I thought it would be cool to do a deep dive into the Wall of Sound. I embarked on writing that initial story because I knew that it had more than just the technology component – it’s a story about obsession, obsessive people who came from all walks of life. After that story came out, it quickly dawned on me that there’s so much more here – like, maybe I could do a full book on this one day.

Related

How did the Dead’s pursuit of quality sound differentiate themselves from their peers and ultimately help them amass the following that they did?

Not long after the band had gotten going, [singer/guitarist] Jerry Garcia’s mother, Ruth, purchased her son a pair of Klipsch speakers. That was, basically, the very first iteration of the Dead’s sound system. No other bands at the time had their own rig like that, so immediately, they were elevated above most of their peers, at a time when musical PAs didn’t exist. Most any club that they were playing at the time, if it did have a sound system, it was just a small little box to like each side of the stage. The famous example, on a bigger level, is the Beatles at Shea Stadium. Live sound presentation in the mid ’60s was kind of terrible.

Then they get hooked up with Owsley Stanley, who was their patron and their original sound man. He was using money that he was making from manufacturing LSD to bankroll the band. He was kitting them out with top-flight gear by early 1966 – and right around that time, the acid tests were getting going. The Dead were basically the in-house band at the acid tests, and the acid tests would be the model that they would follow, really, through the end of their career: During the acid tests, the band and the crowd were all the same organism, everyone was in the same sonic envelope.

The whole point of putting [all the audio equipment] at the musicians’ backs [in the Wall of Sound in 1974] was to ensure that the band and the crowd would all hear the same thing and be in the same sonic envelope together – and that harkened right back to the acid tests. There’s also an ethic with the Dead that was there from the very early days: That ethic was to present the sound in such a way that the person in the very back row would experience the exact same thing as someone who was hanging right on the barrier. Part of their righteous approach to sound was to present the sound in such a way that everyone in the space together [would] experience the same high quality.

At its roots, the Dead almost had a punk-like, DIY ethos. What tensions did that introduce as the band’s operation grew and professionalized?

By the early ’70s, the sound system that was growing into the Wall of Sound had become the center of the Dead’s homegrown world-building project, which included their own record label, in-house travel and booking agencies, a publishing arm, and a whole cottage industry of boutique sound and audio companies that were building kit for the Dead. [The Dead wanted] to do everything their own way; it didn’t necessarily make sense to do what they were doing, but they did it anyway. It was super, super punk, super DIY.

From the very beginning, they would always funnel money back into their sound system – that’s basically how the Wall of Sound was able to grow. As early as mid-1973, management was starting to be like, “Hey guys. We can’t do things like we did in the very early days.” It became clear that they were hemorrhaging money through this sound system. By mid-’74, it was starting to get through to Garcia and some of the other band members that this was not sustainable. Despite their wanting to continue on in this very punk, DIY fashion where money would just always be funneled back into the sound system, the reality was such that they couldn’t do that anymore.

Related

As much as the book is about the band, it’s also about the crew that surrounded it. Why emphasize those supporting characters?

I knew that if I was gonna do this book, I had to push the story forward somehow. I didn’t want to just tell this story through old sound bites from Jerry Garcia or Bob Weir or Phil Lesh. There were so many other people who were in the room in this era who helped put this thing together and who made it go on the road, setting it up and tearing it down. I was really interested in illuminating what the day-to-day was like of conceiving [the Wall of Sound] and building it and taking it on the road. I wanted stretches of the book to kind of feel like you’re going on tour with them.

The Grateful Dead

The Grateful Dead at The Summer Jam at Watkins Glen rock festival at Watkins Glen, New York on July 28, 1973.

Richard Corkery/NY Daily News Archive via Getty Images

Your book outlines several audio innovations by the band, including pioneering the use of on-stage monitors, helping to invent digital delay towers, and using feedback-cancelling microphones to make the Wall of Sound work. What were the most significant lasting impacts the Dead had on modern concert audio?

There’s a number of them. A curved speaker, no one had done that before the Dead. The theory and the mathematics existed, so a curved speaker existed on paper, but the Dead were really the first to fly a curved speaker. Today, you go to see Metallica at a stadium or you go see a local punk band at the dive bar, you’re gonna see versions of a curved speaker – and that’s the Dead lineage.

Delay towers, that’s not the Wall of Sound, but an adjacent sonic first that the Dead and their crew and their technicians helped forge in that era. Kezar Stadium, RFK, Watkins Glen, those three [big outdoor concerts] in summer of ’73 were crucial to figuring out digital delay. That’s another convention of modern sound reinforcement at much bigger shows that anyone is familiar with.

From a philosophical standpoint, a lasting impact of all the Dead’s innovations in the audio realm in this era was an elevated presentation. The Dead instilled this awareness of pursuing the highest-quality sound that you can because you owe it to your audience, because these people are coming to see you perform.

Related

And in turn, that reoriented what fans expected of concert audio, not just at the Dead’s shows but at any show.

By the time the Dead came back from their hiatus in 1976, the world of audio had kind of caught up to them. They realized, “We don’t need to carry this massive equipment with us anymore, because the state of the art has advanced to a point where we can rent a sound system that sounds just as good, if not better, than the Wall of Sound for a fraction of the price.” A lot of that really owes to the ground that they broke through the Wall of Sound.

At a couple points in the book, you quote Garcia interviews from this period where, when lamenting the challenges of ensuring quality audio on tour, he says he wishes the band could have its own venue tailored to its own production standards. That never came to pass – but today, Dead & Company has played upwards of 40 shows at Sphere in Las Vegas. What would Jerry have thought of Sphere?

Last year, the first time I went to the Sphere, walking in, I couldn’t help but draw all of these connections. In the very early ’70s, they were always having conversations about, “Gee, wouldn’t it be great if we had our own spot where we could set up our sound system, just exactly perfect, and people can come see us perform?” They started to take some very serious steps to figure out, “OK, what would this space look like?” One of the ideas they were kicking around was a Buckminster Fuller-style geodesic dome – like a sphere. So, you walk into the Sphere to see Dead and Company, it’s like, “Oh, here it is.” Inside of the Sphere is basically the Wall of Sound, but taken to an exponential degree. The Wall of Sound walked so the Sphere could run.

I have to think Garcia would’ve been tickled to take the Sphere for a ride. There’s the public perception of Garcia as this wooly, hippie-type guy, but he was always embracing the cutting edge, from the gear that he was playing and just experimenting with to getting really into computers in the late ’80s and early ’90s. He just loved, like, f—king around with the newest technology.

What’s your favorite Wall of Sound show?

June 16, 1974, at the Des Moines Fairgrounds, for sonic and setlist reasons as much as personal reasons – my mother was at that show. That show, to me, is the epitome of your outdoor Grateful Dead show in the sun in the summertime. An amazing show. [Editor’s note: Selections from this show were officially released in 2009 as Road Trips Volume 2 Number 3, which is available on streaming platforms.]

Loud and Clear: The Grateful Dead’s Wall of Sound and the Quest for Audio Perfection will be released by St. Martin’s Press on June 17. 

Grateful Dead 'Loud and Clear.'

Loud and Clear.

Courtesy Photo

All products and services featured are independently chosen by editors. However, Billboard may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links, and the retailer may receive certain auditable data for accounting purposes.

Caitlin Clark is continuing her partnership with Wilson by dropping all-new Clark-branded basketballs in colorful styles.

Created to inspire aspiring basketball stars everywhere, the collection includes four new balls available to pre-order now on Wilson’s website. All the signature styles will be available starting June 23. Prospective buyers can be notified when the collection drops by plugging in their email and first name via Wilson’s website. Prices range from $124.95 to $27.95.

The four styles are made of game-ready materials with Clark’s signature embossed on the front along with Wilson branding. You’ve got the Caitlin Clark Evo NXT Embrace Game Basketball, Caitlin Clark WNBA Oasis Basketball, Caitlin Clark Aspire UV Basketball and Caitlin Clark Envision Basketball. With so many styles to choose from, we’re breaking down the collection to help you make an educated decision before adding to cart.

How to buy Wilson x Caitlin Clark basketballs online

Caitlin Clark Evo NXT Embrace Game Basketball

An orange and black basketball with sound wave graphics.


Retailing for $124.95, this ball features a slew of unique performance tech to up your game including a micro-touch grip, pebbled composite channels to enhance grip and control during dribbling and a super soft core for elite control. The ball is a standard orange hue, equipped with co-branding featuring decibel meter graphics in purple and blue reflecting in-game decibel levels from an audio file of the sound from an Indiana Fever game. Black contrasting stripes offer the ball visual interest.

How to buy Wilson x Caitlin Clark basketballs online

Caitlin Clark WNBA Oasis Basketball

A blue and white basketball with colorful abstract graphics.


A colorful addition to Clark’s signature collection, the Oasis model features hand-drawn, abstract patterns of water, fairways and sand traps in colorful hues meant to reflect the basketball star’s “happy places.” From the golf course to the court, this ball comes equipped with a Pure Feel indoor/outdoor cover to take your games anywhere, along with pebbled composite channels and WNBA-inspired alternating panels. This model is meant to inspire athletes to find their own “oasis” whatever that may be.

How to buy Wilson x Caitlin Clark basketballs online

Caitlin Clark Aspire UV Basketball

A gray and red basketball that changes in the sunlight.


Meant for pickup games out in the sun, the Aspire model changes before your very eyes. When exposed to sunlight, the ball transforms to reveal inspirational pre-game pep talks, sharing her words of wisdom and encouragement to athletes everywhere ahead so you can get your head right ahead of a game, pro or otherwise. Like the other balls in this collection, the Aspire is fixed with game-enhancing tech like deeper channels between the panels of the ball that allow for more grip and better ball control, along with a durable all-surface cover that makes the ball suitable to use on any court surface.

How to buy Wilson x Caitlin Clark basketballs online

Caitlin Clark Envision Basketball

A light blue and dark blue basketball with inspirational graphics.


Retailing for $27.95, the Envision model is the simplest of the bunch, but don’t let that stop you from snagging it. This ball’s design channels Clark’s “Dream Big” mantra thanks to abstract hidden messages featured throughout. This ball includes the aforementioned durable all-surface cover, along with deep channels and a unique air retention lining. The model is a pastel blue with darker blue accents and logo detailing that creates contrast. One or all of these basketballs would make a great gift for the basketball fan in your life. Even better if they love Clark.

If you can’t wait for the drop, Clark’s other collaborative balls are just as good and still available to shop now on Wilson’s website.

How to buy Wilson x Caitlin Clark basketballs online

Caitlin Clark Fever Rising Basketball

A deep blue and red basketball with contrasting white graphics.


This basketball is intensely striking, sure to catch your eye during a game. The ball is navy and red with yellow accents that harken to Clark’s team Indiana Fever. The back panels feature a triple-stacked Caitlin Clark graphic, with her name and number 22 integrated into the Indiana Fever-inspired pattern. This basketball features deep channels to improve grip and control accompanied by an all-surface cover that’s perfect for spontaneous games outdoors.

How to buy Wilson x Caitlin Clark basketballs online

Caitlin Clark Journey Series Basketball

A black ball with confetti-like graphics.


Retailing for $21.95, this basketball model is celebratory in nature. The Journey Series style is made to honor the stops along the way of Clark’s basketball career that has shaped her into the star she is. The all-black silhouette visually captures Caitlin’s shooting chart from her college career where she’s scored every point, with each dot symbolizing a colorway from Caitlin’s teams from high school to college to pro. Like the other models in Caitlin’s collection, this ball comes equipped with a durable all-surface cover along with deep channels and a specialized inflation retention lining.

The Canadians are beefin’.

Drake wasn’t happy with the former leader of Canada’s New Democratic Party for attending one of the Kendrick Lamar and SZA Grand National Tour stops in Toronto last week. The Toronto rapper posted a screenshot on his Instagram Story of his DMs with Canadian politician Jagmeet Singh where he said to him, “You’re a goof,” after Singh was spotted at the show.

After facing some backlash from Toronto natives and Drake fans on social media, Singh seemingly saw the error in his ways and took to his own Instagram Story to issue an apology. “I went for SZA, not Kendrick,” he tried to clarify. “I was born in this city. I love this city. But real talk, I get it. I shouldn’t have gone at all. OVO and Drake have lifted up this city and [Canada]. For me it’ll always be Drake over Kendrick.”

A lot went down during the first Toronto tour stop that could easily have gotten under Drizzy’s skin. Lamar performed “Not Like Us” during the first date in Toronto and was asked by the crowd to perform the hit diss song again in its first live performance in Drake’s backyard. Footage also surfaced of fans rapping “Not Like Us” while visiting Chinese restaurant New Ho King amid rumors of heightened security surrounding the concert.

In other Drake related news, he dropped a new verse on his OVO signee Smiley’s recent single “2 Mazza” from his album Don’t Box Me In. And he had to reschedule a stream with Kai Cenat twice to finish going through submissions for their “Somebody Love’s Me” video treatment cash giveaway, with one of the streaming dates scheduled during K-Dot and SZA’s first Grand National Toronto date.

Add this to the latest chapter of the Kendrick vs. Drake saga.

All products and services featured are independently chosen by editors. However, Billboard may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links, and the retailer may receive certain auditable data for accounting purposes.

Fresh off of headlining Coachella Music Festival as well as kicking off his BIG ASS Stadium Tour, Post Malone is staying hydrated with a highly-anticipated collaboration with Stanley 1913. Announced last month, the “I Ain’t Coming Back” singer is dropping a limited-edition collection of thirst-quenching water bottles and tumblers today, June 16. The release is now available to purchase on stanley1913.com.

The Stanley 1913 x Post Malone limited-edition collection features beloved products across the brand’s popular Hydration, Bar and Originals categories. Fans can shop coveted items including a Quencher H2.0 FlowState Tumbler, which has become a fan-favorite, best seller on Amazon and has received many recording artist and athlete co-signs including Tyla, Olivia RodrigoLainey WilsonLionel Messi and LoveShack Fancy.

Post Malone Stanley 1913 Limited-Edition Tumbler Collection: Shop Here

Post Malone x Stanley Quencher H2.0 FlowState Tumbler


There’s also a stacking pint and classic water bottle included. Also, a premium lunch box and classic bottle set will be available, marking a first-time collaboration for these Stanley products. On the outside, the collection’s design esthetic is inspired by Post’s unconventional and eclectic style, featuring a limited-edition “MultiCam camouflage” makeup.

“I’ve always been a big fan of Stanley 1913, so being able to collaborate with them has been awesome, says Post Malone in a statement. “The whole collection is badass. I’m excited for y’all to see what we made.”

Post Malone Stanley 1913 Limited-Edition Tumbler Collection: Shop Here

Post Malone x Stanley Legendary Classic Bottle and Lunch Box Set


“This partnership beautifully merges the innovative quality and creativity our community expects with Post’s authentic and expressive modern country aesthetic,” said Kate Ridley, Chief Brand Officer, Stanley 1913. “We’ve poured our combined love for style as personal expression into this collection, and we know our consumers will love it as much as we do.”

Posty is currently on his BIG ASS stadium tour with Jelly Roll, which kicked off last month in Salt Lake, Utah, and is planning to hit San Antonio and Arlington, TX, Atlanta, St. Louis, Detroit, Minneapolis, Chicago, Philadelphia, Hershey and Pittsburgh, Miami, Orlando, Denver, L.A. and Portland before winding down on July 1 in San Francisco.

Shop the Stanley 1913 x Post Malone collection here before they sell out. If you’re in the market for even more Stanley products, we’ve rounded up a few fan-favorite products below, including Quencher H2.0 Tumbler and the Stay-Hot Camp Mug.

Post Malone Stanley 1913 Limited-Edition Tumbler Collection: Shop Here

CURRENT BESTSELLER

Stanley Quencher H2.0 Tumbler


Post Malone Stanley 1913 Limited-Edition Tumbler Collection: Shop Here

STANLEY 1913

The Quencher ProTour Flip Straw Tumbler


Post Malone Stanley 1913 Limited-Edition Tumbler Collection: Shop Here

STANLEY 1913

Classic Lunch Box


Post Malone Stanley 1913 Limited-Edition Tumbler Collection: Shop Here

STANLEY 1913

The Stay-Hot Camp Mug


Post Malone Stanley 1913 Limited-Edition Tumbler Collection: Shop Here

STANLEY 1913

The All Day Julienne Midi Cooler


“I look back at that time, and it was so romantic,” Ryn Weaver tells Billboard, “and I was so young, and so brave, and so scared, and kind of staying high so I didn’t have to come down.”

Weaver needs every adjective she can find to describe the personal and professional whirlwind that she experienced a decade ago. In June 2014, the singer-songwriter born Aryn Wüthrich made her debut with “OctaHate,” a sleek, lightly swaying synth-pop gem with effervescent verses and a hammered-down hook; she uploaded the track onto Soundcloud, and it rapidly took off with pre-TikTok social media shares and critical approval. 

Pop Twitter noted the song’s pedigree — not only did “OctaHate” boast a co-writing credit from a then-red-hot Charli XCX with Weaver, but Benny Blanco, Passion Pit leader Michael Angelakos and Norwegian polymath Cashmere Cat all helped pen and produce the song. But more immediate were 21-year-old Weaver’s dynamic voice and theatrical delivery, adding dramatic heft to each of the song’s finely crafted melodies. Combined with the news that “OctaHate” preceded a debut album that Blanco and Angelakos would co-helm, and that Blanco would release through his Interscope imprint Friends Keep Secrets, Weaver appeared to have the skills and industry buy-in to become an alt-pop star.

Weaver’s debut, 2015’s The Fool, brimmed with promise and personality, debuting at No. 30 on the Billboard 200 and prompting a headlining tour and festival dates over the following year. None of the follow-up singles built upon the commercial success of “OctaHate,” though, and a follow-up album never materialized. “It was also very sad, and very heartbreaking,” Weaver says today, “and I was very lost, even though I was just charging into the night.”

In the years since, Weaver’s name would pop up as a co-writer on songs like 2019’s “Dream Glow” by BTS and Charli XCX, and 2021’s “Just For Me” by SAINT JHN and SZA; “Pierre,” the anthemic fan favorite from The Fool, has also been a perennial TikTok favorite, inspiring multiple trends beginning in 2021 and racking up even more U.S. on-demand streams at this point than “OctaHate” (111.7 million to 63.4 million, according to Luminate). Yet Weaver, whose wit and sincerity once made her a must-follow on Twitter and Instagram, mostly vanished from social media, and years passed between updates on in-the-works music.

On Monday (June 16) — the 10-year anniversary of The Fool — that wait finally ended. “Odin St” may be Weaver’s first official single in a decade, created with a darker tone (courtesy of co-producers Benjamin Greenspan and Constantine Anastasakis) and a more mature perspective. But longtime fans will recognize the idiosyncratic wordplay, loping syllables and ornate hooks that bend toward a major chorus, all as magnetic today as when Weaver barreled into view a decade ago.

Now 32 and without a label — she’s no longer working with Blanco but describes their parting as amicable, and says that she still keeps in touch with Angelakos — Weaver says that “Odin St” will lead into the sophomore act that she always knew she had inside of her, but which required time to germinate. 

“I went through a very singular, and yet kind of clichéd, experience,” Weaver explains of her early stardom, “where I didn’t feel like I could fully communicate it yet. It was, like, above my pay grade, the language to discuss what was going on. I needed some space from certain experiences to actually be able to write from a place of clarity.”

Ahead of the release of “Odin St,” Weaver discussed where she’s been, and where she finally hopes to go next. (Ed. note: this interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.)

Where did “Odin St” come from?

Chronologically, the song is where The Fool ended. [The album’s final song, “New Constellations”] ends, “You can run, if you want to.” I think it’s pretty clear that I left my label — I asked to be released — and so I moved to L.A., across the country, and my manager picked out a place for me to stay. It was on Odin Street in Los Angeles, and I didn’t know the lore of Odin at that time, but it was this safe haven, bunker, Grey Gardens situation. I hid there, I guess, and waited for some dust to settle. 

And then later, thinking about the lore of Odin, I just love that he’s the god of wisdom, and he represents people who are willing to give up everything on their journey for their acquisition of wisdom. I felt like that was such a poem in and of itself — being on Odin Street, and knowing that was my journey, but it’s a very long journey to actually acquiring wisdom. It was also the inverse — I was making the first step, but in reality, I was partying, and hiding, and I was with someone I shouldn’t have been with. And so it was kind of this house down the road from wisdom.

When did you start piecing the actual song together?

I think I started an idea for it like three years later, and then I scrapped that. And then I went in with [producer-songwriter] Active Child, and we started something – but it was almost too joyful in a way, too romantic. I started the verse there, and then we didn’t see each other through COVID. And then I was writing with a guy named Constantine, whose artist project is Blonder, and we were writing for a young artist that my friend was managing, in the desert. We got on very well, and we got back home and were talking about working together. He has this very interesting dark guitar tone. 

We hung out all night, and I think it was 7:00 AM when we started writing it. Funny enough, the song is in the key that it’s in because of my throat — I was like, “It’s 7:00 AM, this is where I can sing this song.” And we even tried to change it a couple times, but key characteristics are so important. We lifted it a half [key], and then it sounded like a jingle. I was like, “We’re keeping it where it is, because it’s dark, and it’s gritty.”

“Odin St” has been rumored to come out for a few years now. Why was now the right time?

For my fans, I love the idea of putting something out on the 10-year for The Fool. We never did a re-pressing — we did one pressing, and people constantly ask me, “Can I get a record?” I don’t have any! But this song is literally where I left you, and it’s a darker color palette. I like that it’s lower — I wasn’t really encouraged to sing in a lower register on the first record. So this is also kind of a break-free moment, of I can do whatever I want. And I also just think it’s a foray into a darker new chapter, while still being light enough.

How close was this moment to happening in the past? Were there starts and stops?

There were so many starts and stops.  There have been three separate times I was getting ready, and there were different songs, too. There was one that I was like, “I feel like that’s the wrong story to start with.” I would get close, and then pull back. I’ve had to get to a point of regaining a lot of self-trust, because working with super-producers and then leaving — you have a splash like that, and then you’re coming back, and there’s this feeling like, “This is different.” So I think I was scared.  

I was never lying to anyone. I always thought I would release something, but then the logistics of it come into play. It costs money. I don’t want to give away my power and immediately sign somewhere. Maintaining autonomy was also important to me. I think, at this moment in time, I am able to do that.

Was co-writing for other artists, or serving as a guest vocalist, ever a lane you considered?

I’ve written for other people — I wrote for SAINt JHN and SZA, and I did something for BTS. I’ve had a lot of random, lucky cuts. If you take this much time off — I’m not connected in the industry through family, I don’t have a giant trust fund or anything. I felt like the universe was protecting me, being like, “Here’s this Head and the Heart song, you can keep going.” That was also a really nice way to pull back and de-center myself, especially while I was pulling back the arrow and deciding what this new chapter would look like.

I turned down a couple really big features at the time, but I think it was because I wanted to establish myself as an artist with my voice. The music industry has changed, but at the time, I felt there was a bit of a trap in being a features artist. I really wanted for my first big feature for everyone to be like, “Oh, damn, they’re working together!,” not, “Who the f–k is that?” I was pretty stubborn about wanting to continue to develop my own voice to where it feels like, that is a worthy collaboration, instead of being thrown onto something. I was maybe a little cagey, but I stand by that decision.

Around the release of The Fool, you were all over social media and constantly online. And then you took a step back for a long time.

Well at the time, I wasn’t releasing — I don’t know how many selfies or how much content the world really needs. But also, I started seeing someone who’s wonderful, and who doesn’t have social media. And I was like, “Wow, I want to do that for a minute.” It was like, what am I trying to get here? Am I going to post a snippet? Am I going to react or bandwagon? I was like, “They don’t need me right now. Open up the stage for the people they need right now.” 

I’ve been onstage my whole life, since I was four, and was a bit of an overachiever in that sense. I was performing professionally at events, and singing for sports games, and then I was the lead in plays, and I was in bands, and then I got into [NYU], and then I dropped out of school, and then I met Benny, and everything was just like, good, good, good, good. And I didn’t understand myself outside of the context of other people, and my value was heavily tied to my ability to entertain or perform. 

I think the time off has been really transformative, in the sense that you really do have to find what your intrinsic value is. That was a very painful process. And this is the longest I’ve not been onstage in my life, but it was so crucial to my general development. So I think you have a couple of little ego deaths in there, where you don’t need to fight for attention.

So what were your areas of interest while you were detached? Did you pick up new hobbies?

I traveled a bit. I’ve gone on weird hiking road trips. I got a sewing machine. I got back into painting. I hung out with my friends and my family a lot. I was a good cat mom. I go dancing, I exercise, I swim in the sea. I was living my life! I do have to acknowledge screens — it’s a very depressing truth that we all binge more than we want to, and we all are on our phones more than we want to be, and I’m trying not to do that, but sometimes my nights are that. I was a bartender for a second. I’ve been in therapy. I’m doing what anybody else is doing.

Did you ever consider leaving music altogether?

I did, but I didn’t. You can talk yourself in and out of everything — I was like, “Maybe I’ll go to school and study semiotics! I’ll go write a book!” Or I was like, “Maybe the industry is too toxic!” I was in a very different industry, pre-MeToo, and women were pitted against each other in different ways. There was a little bit of seeing how the sausage was made, and being there, the industry felt strange. 

More for the drama of it, I was like, “Maybe I’ll leave.” And I had enough reasons to, and most people would have. But I think I always had that thing that was like, “It’ll be next year.” It was more prolonging the [return], and never like I was actually going to pivot.

When you did check in with the rest of the world, how meaningful was it to read fan messages asking about a comeback or hoping you were working on new music?

Super meaningful, and also heartbreaking. You take this much time off, some of it is trying to find your next perfect-match collaborator. You’ll do some of the speed dating, and someone will want to do “OctaHate 2.0,” when you’re trying to transform. So sometimes I’d get those messages, and especially when I felt so far away from releasing, I was like, “I want to be there too. I’m figuring it out.” But it also kept me going, knowing that I had such a strong fan base and people that really love me. I also kept in touch with so many of them.

I had isolated for a long time, and became sort of hermetic. I like that side of myself, but I also need people. It’s like in the Peter Pan play, where Tinker Bell starts dying and needs everyone in the audience to say, “I do believe in fairies, I do, I do,” to survive. When you’re out of the public eye, and you don’t know how necessary what you have to say is at all — having people being like, “We believe, we care, we’ll listen,” that matters.

How does it feel to be on the precipice of releasing new music?

I feel really calm, in a way. I think I was so frantic with “OctaHate” — it was one of those releases where it was like, “We’re just gonna put this out today!” “Oh, we are?” It was horrifying. I threw up that day. I was like, “Oh God, this is happening.” But I’ve waited so long now that I feel ready to go. 

We have a couple more songs coming down the pipeline, and then I think we’re going to do an announcement for… other stuff. But as of now, I just want to focus on this. I’m also actively in EMDR, which is really cool. I’m really preparing myself to come back to the industry from every angle, and feel really like secure and stable coming back. So it’s like, a nice summer, getting me ready to to do the damn thing.

Are you thinking about playing shows?

Oh, yeah. I mean, that’s kind of my favorite part of it. I love writing, but being onstage in that communal heartbeat thing — where someone can be attached to the work for a completely different reason [than someone else], but everyone’s singing it at each other — it’s just this electricity. 

I remember before I first went on tour, I was doing radio promo and all this stuff that made me feel disconnected from what I was doing. And as soon as I went on tour, I was like, “Oh my God, this is it — I’m a road dog, I am a sailor.” I grew up doing theater, show after show, and it’s always different. And getting to interact with people, hanging with them after the show — I had people coming on the bus and doing shots with me, and it was just so fun and free. I will be a better girl this time! I mean, you can only pull that off at 22. But, yeah, that’s the best part of it, to me.

What do you expect to feel when you return to the stage and start performing songs from The Fool?

I mean, hopefully no one is the same person as they were a decade ago. I want to say something in defense of The Fool, though. I feel there was a while where I couldn’t listen to it — almost like, “What was that? Oh, my God.” There’s a lot of things that I was embarrassed about when I was younger, like doing theater and this and that. But to me, they’re like, these beautiful baby pictures. And I was just so brave and young, and there was no thought about anything, other than “I only have this many days to write an album, so I’m gonna do it.” And it was high-pressure, high-stakes. I was living a very exciting life. And I just have so much love for that album. 

I’m sure we’ll reimagine some of the instrumentation, but for some of them, we won’t. It’s a chapter that literally gave me the ability to be talking to you right now, and gave me the ability to have fans and have opportunities. I re-listen to it now, and not to toot our horn, but with Benny and Michael and me, it was a sound that’s got legs, and it feels timeless. The songs are strange, but still big. And I feel like that is the way I write. 

I do feel like these two albums are going to be companion pieces — the first one is very bold and bright, and there’s a lot of darkness in what I wrote, even if the energy isn’t. And the newer stuff is a bit of a photo negative. Different colors, but it’s not like I’m not a romantic, theatrical, intense person still. I’ve just matured.

Sean “Diddy” Combs‘ children didn’t get to spend Father’s Day with him, but that didn’t stop many of them from celebrating their dad on the holiday.

Related

In posts on Instagram on Sunday (June 15), all of the disgraced Bad Boy Records founder’s adult biological kids paid tribute to Diddy, who is currently in custody as his sex-trafficking trial unfolds in New York City. Justin Combs, whose mother is Misa Hylton, shared a black-and-white video featuring his father and wrote, “HAPPY FATHER’S DAY POPS THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME LIFE & ALWAYS BEING PRESENT!”

“MY SUPER HERO!” added the 30-year-old. “I’M W YOU 4EVER NO MATTTER WHAT!! MISS YOU & LOVE YOU.”

Christian Combs, whom Diddy shared with late model Kim Porter, posted a throwback photo of himself as a young boy with the hip-hop titan. “Happy Fathers Day Pops!!” the 27-year-old wrote. “I Love you & miss you !!! We waiting for you at [home].”

Diddy’s 18-year-old daughter Chance, whom he welcomed with Sarah Chapman in 2006, shared a photo of herself as a child cuddling up with her dad on a boat. “Missing you today on Fathers Day,” she wrote. “My love for you is beyond! Not a day goes by that I don’t think of you and miss you. I’m forever grateful for all the beautiful moments we shared. I miss you so much and love you and can’t wait to hug you.”

And finally, Diddy’s 18-year-old twin girls with Porter, D’Lila and Jessie, posted a family beach photo to mark the occasion. “Happy Father’s Day to the best dad in the entire world,” they wrote on their joint Instagram account. “We love you so so much words can’t even explain. You have always been there for us whenever we needed you no matter what through thick and thin.”

“We appreciate everything you’ve done for us and we couldn’t ask for a better dad,” added D’Lila and Jessie. “The bond we have is inseparable and unplaceable. We are so blessed to be given a dad as great as you are. We love and miss you so so much.”

This Father’s Day marked Diddy’s first since he was arrested last September on charges of sex trafficking and racketeering. He is now about six weeks into his federal trial, which has seen prosecutors question multiple witnesses — including his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura — about his alleged drug-fueled sex parties (aka “freak-offs”), during which he would allegedly force his partners to have sex with male escorts as he masturbated.

Diddy’s legal team has denied all of the accusations. During opening statements in May, his attorney, Teny Geragos, told the jury: “Sean Combs is a complicated man, but this is not a complicated case. We take full responsibility that there was domestic violence. Domestic violence is not sex trafficking.”

The music mogul is also sad to adopted child Quincy Taylor Brown — Porter’s son with record producer Al B. Sure! — as well as 2-year-old daughter Love, whom he welcomed in 2022 with Dana Tran.

Justin Bieber has heard all the comments from fans who are worried about his health and well-being, as well as those offering him advice on how to live his life. “People keep telling me to heal,” Bieber wrote on Monday morning (June 16) in a post cued to WizKid’s “Blessed.”

Related

“Don’t you think if I could have fixed myself I would have already? I know I’m broken. I know I have anger issues,” the singer added. “I tried to do the work my whole life to be like the people who told me I needed to be fixed like them. And it just keeps making me more tired and more angry. The harder I try to grow, the more focussed on myself I am.”

The singer concluded by writing, “Jesus is the only person who keeps me wanting to make my life about others. Because honestly I’m exhausted with thinking about myself lately aren’t you?” The post came just hours after the singer shared an image of what appeared to be his hand holding a burning blunt, as well as what appeared to be a back and forth with what appeared to be a now-former friend.

“I will never suppress my emotions for someone. Conflict is a part of relationship. If you don’t like my anger you don’t like me,” he wrote. “My anger is a response To pain I have been thru. Asking a traumatized person not to be traumatized is simply mean.”

The conversation then got heated when the unidentified other person responded that they were “not used to someone lashing out at me. It’s not hat I don’t see and feel your anger.” Bieber was non-plussed, quickly calling an end to their relationship. “Ouch. This friendship is officially over,” he wrote. “I will never accept a man calling my anger lashing out. I enjoyed our short lived relationship. I wasn’t kidding when I told u I didn’t need u as a friend. I have good friends. Who will respect these boundaries.”

The singer then got testy, telling the person he always considered them a “p–sy… which is why I alway kept my distance but I was willing to give you the benifit [sic] of the doubt. This confirms u were the p–sy I always thought u were [middle finger emoji].”

He ended by asking the person to leave him alone, noting that he is now blocking them. At press time a spokesperson for Bieber had not returned Billboard‘s request for comment on the posts.

Bieber has been on a posting spree lately, bouncing between cryptic images and close-up selfies, brief glimpses of the back of his and wife Hailey Biebers’ infant son, Jack Blues, and serious posts in which he lashes out at unsolicited advice. “Telling other humans they deserve something is like raising someone else’s kids,” he wrote on June 3. “Who are you to tell someone what someone should or shouldn’t have. The audacity. That’s not your place. God decides what we deserve.”

Back in March, Bieber sparked concern when he told fans he felt like he was “drowning” in “hate” and struggling with feeling “unworthy.” Bieber has been largely off the music radar since canceling a tour in 2022 to deal with the effects of Ramsay Hunt syndrome, which included partial facial paralysis. He appears to be working on the follow-up to his 2021 album Justice, but at press time on additional information was available on that project.

Check out Bieber’s post below.

Ed Sheeran’s next tour isn’t going to include a stop at the U.S. Supreme Court.

In an order issued Monday, the high court refused to revive a long-running lawsuit that claimed Sheeran’s 2014 hit “Thinking Out Loud” infringed Marvin Gaye‘s famed 1973 jam “Let’s Get It On.”

The star’s legal accuser — a company that owns a partial stake in Gaye’s 1973 song — had asked the justices to hear the case, which was dismissed in November by a lower court that ruled the two tracks share only basic “musical building blocks.”

Related

But the justices denied that request on Monday, allowing that earlier ruling to stand. As is typical, the Supreme Court did not offer any explanation for why it had refused to hear the case. The high court hears only a tiny fraction of the cases it receives.

Sheeran has faced multiple lawsuits over “Thinking,” a 2014 track co-written with Amy Wadge that reached No. 2 on the Billboard Hot 100 and ultimately spent 58 weeks on the chart.

He was first sued by the daughter of Ed Townsend, who co-wrote the famed 1973 tune with Gaye – a case that ended with a high-profile jury verdict clearing Sheeran. He was then hit with a separate case by Structured Asset Sales (SAS), an entity owned by industry executive David Pullman that controls a different stake in Townsend’s copyrights to the legendary song.

That suit was rejected in November by the federal Second Circuit appeals court, which said the lawsuit was essentially seeking “a monopoly over a combination of two fundamental musical building blocks.”

“The four-chord progression at issue — ubiquitous in pop music — even coupled with a syncopated harmonic rhythm, is too well-explored to meet the originality threshold that copyright law demands,” the appeals court wrote. “Overprotecting such basic elements would threaten to stifle creativity and undermine the purpose of copyright law.”

In a petition to the Supreme Court in March, SAS argued that the earlier ruling had unfairly restricted the case to written sheet music rather than Gaye’s iconic recorded version. It claimed that problem would impact “the rights of thousands of legacy musical composers and artists, of many of the most beloved and enduring pieces of popular music.”

Related

But in a response filing last month, Sheeran’s lawyers said SAS was using a “false premise” and “baseless assertions” to try to get the justices to revive the case: “The petition should be denied.”

Monday’s denial will finally end SAS’s lawsuit against Sheeran, but the pop star not quite out of the legal woods just yet. Pullman’s company later filed a second, more novel case in which it is seeking to sue Sheeran over the more detailed recorded version of Gaye’s song; that case has been paused for years while the earlier lawsuit plays out.

In a statement to Billboard on Monday, Pullman said that separate case “will now go forward” in federal court: “Defendants fear has always been the sound recording of ‘Let’s Get It On’,” Pullman said. “The US Supreme Court was aware of this and understands that the case will go forward and may very well be back at the US Supreme Court at a later date.”

Attorneys for Sheeran did not immediately return requests for comment on Monday.

Morgan Wallen’s I’m the Problem leads Billboard‘s Top Country Albums chart (dated June 21) for a fourth week. This ups Wallen’s career tally of weeks at No. 1 to 190. That allows him to extend his lead as the artist with the most weeks at No. 1 in the chart’s 61-year history.

Wallen’s achievement is especially impressive because he has amassed this hefty total of weeks at No. 1 in such a short amount of time. He first topped the chart on Aug. 15, 2020.

Top Country Albums originated as Hot Country Albums in the Jan. 11, 1964 issue of Billboard. Johnny Cash’s Ring of Fire (The Best of Johnny Cash) headed the inaugural chart. The compilation was well-timed: “Ring of Fire” had headed Hot Country Songs for seven weeks the previous summer and had crossed over to reach the top 20 on the Billboard Hot 100.

The chart was named Hot Country LP’s from 1968 to 1984, when vinyl LPs were king.

Twenty-one artists have logged 50 or more weeks at No. 1 on Top Country Albums. Male solo artists dominate, as you might expect, though three female solo artists have achieved the feat, as have two groups. (One of those groups is an all-female group.) Only one Black artist has amassed 50 or more weeks at No. 1, though that may change as country becomes more inclusive.

Here’s a look at all artists who have topped Top Country Albums for 50 or more weeks.

Forever No. 1 is a Billboard series that pays special tribute to the recently deceased artists who achieved the highest honor our charts have to offer — a Billboard Hot 100 No. 1 single — by taking an extended look back at the chart-topping songs that made them part of this exclusive club. Here, we honor Brian Wilson, who died on Wednesday (June 11) at age 82, by looking at the first of The Beach Boys’ three Hot 100-toppers: the irresistible pop smash “I Get Around.”

Related

The Beach Boys had racked up four consecutive top 10 hits on the Billboard Hot 100 (discounting B sides) prior to “I Get Around,” but this ebullient song was their first single to reach No. 1. They recorded it in April 1964, making it the first song they recorded after The Beatles arrived in the U.S. that February.

If The Beach Boys felt threatened by the Fab Four’s explosive arrival, they were not going down without a fight. “I Get Around” is chock-full of hooks – great harmonies, handclaps, twangy guitar work and the inspired “round-round-getaround” hook.

In his liner notes for the 1990 reissue of Little Deuce Coupe and All Summer Long, Beach Boys expert David Leaf said the track represented “a major, revolutionary step in Brian’s use of dynamics.” He added: “From the opening note to the falsetto wail on the fade, this is one of the greatest tracks the Beach Boys ever cut. … Powered by the driving lead guitar break, the explosive harmonies and the handclaps, everything about this track was very spirited.”

The song runs a highly efficient 2:14, making it the second-shortest No. 1 hit of 1964. The Beatles’ “Can’t Buy Me Love” was a couple of seconds shorter.

With this song, The Beach Boys continued to move away from the surf music fad that they rode in on, with such hits as 1962’s “Surfin” and “Surfin’ Safari” and 1963’ “Surfin’ U.S.A.” and “Surfer Girl.” Like its immediate predecessors “Be True to Your School” and “Fun, Fun, Fun,” “I Get Around” has nothing to do with catching a wave, but instead is more generally capturing teen life in early-’60s California. (And, when you think about it, driving songs played nearly as big a part of the early Beach Boys success as surfing songs, between “I Get Around,” “Fun, Fun, Fun,” “Little Deuce Coupe,” “409” and others.)

Mike Love sang lead vocals on “I Get Around,” with Brian Wilson contributing falsetto lead vocals on the chorus. All five members of the group – also including Al Jardine, Carl Wilson and Dennis Wilson – contributed harmony and backing vocals. The fabled Wrecking Crew of top Los Angeles session players, including Hal Blaine and Glen Campbell, played on the track.

Related

The song has a line that seems autobiographical, given the group’s rising level of success over the previous two years: “My buddies and me are gettin’ real well-known.” The song also includes one of the most charming lines ever in a pop song: “None of the guys go steady ’cause it wouldn’t be right/ To leave your best girl home on a Saturday night.”

The group projects a strutting confidence throughout. Biographer Mark Dillon compared the lyrics to “the braggadocio of a modern-day rapper” — fitting that nearly 30 years later, one of the all-time most legendary MCs would recycle the title for his own cockiest hit.

The song entered the Hot 100 at No. 76 for the week ending May 23, 1964. It was the week’s fourth-highest new entry, behind hits by Elvis, Bobby Vinton and Lesley Gore, though it wound up eclipsing all of those. The song reached No. 1 in its seventh week, July 4, displacing Peter & Gordon’s “A World Without Love,” which was written by Paul McCartney (though officially credited to Lennon/McCartney.)

Billboard Hot 100

Billboard Hot 100

Billboard

McCartney and Wilson, two of the greatest songwriters of all time, spurred each other on to ever-greater heights for many years. The Beatles’ “Back in the U.S.S.R.” was clearly an homage to The Beach Boys’ “Surfin’ U.S.A.”

“I Get Around” topped the Hot 100 for two weeks, before being displaced by The 4 Seasons“Rag Doll.” (These groups, representing the pinnacle of West Coast and the East Coast pop, respectively, were among the few American groups from the pre-Beatles era that continued to thrive after the British invasion.) “I Get Around” also put The Beach Boys on the map in the U.K., becoming their first top 10 hit in that country.

The B side of “I Get Around” was the equally great “Don’t Worry Baby,” making this one of the strongest double-sided singles in pop music history. It ranks with Elvis’ “Don’t Be Cruel”/ “Hound  Dog,” The Beatles’ “Penny Lane”/“Strawberry Fields Forever,” The Beach Boys’ own “Wouldn’t It Be Nice”/“God Only Knows” and a handful of others.

The song was the opening track on (and only single released from) the group’s sixth album, All Summer Long, which reached No. 4 on the Billboard 200 in August 1964. In his liner notes to the 1990 reissue, Leaf noted, “All Summer Long was the last regular studio album The Beach Boys recorded before Brian quit the touring band – the last complete Beach Boys album Brian cut before he suffered a nervous breakdown in late December of 1964.”

Incredibly, “I Get Around” didn’t receive a single Grammy nomination. The Beach Boys’ only songs to receive Grammy nods were “Good Vibrations” and the 1988 Brian-less hit “Kokomo.” The Recording Academy has since sought to make amends, awarding The Beach Boys a lifetime achievement award in 2001 and inducting five of their most classic works (including “I Get Around”) into the Grammy Hall of Fame.

Related

Wilson was initially the only songwriter credited on the song. In 1992, Mike Love sued to get a credit on this and many other songs. Love prevailed in December 1994, when he was awarded co-writing credits on 35 songs – as well as $13 million. In his series “The Number Ones,” Stereogum writer Tom Breihan wryly summarized the dispute: “Mike Love later sued Brian for a co-writer credit, and if he really did come up with the round round getaround part, he deserved it.”

While there is no improving on The Beach Boys’ recording of “I Get Around,” several artists have taken a stab at it over the years. Red Hot Chili Peppers performed it at the 2005 MusiCares Person of the Year gala where Brian Wilson was honored. My Morning Jacket performed it on the 2023 special A Grammy Salute to the Beach Boys (which CBS re-aired on Sunday night).

Related

Billie Joe Armstrong posted his version of the song on Instagram on Wednesday (June 11), hours after the news of Wilson’s death broke. “Thank you Brian Wilson,” Armstrong wrote. “I recorded a cover of ‘I Get Around’ a few years ago. ..never got to share it. One of my all time favorite songs ever.”

Check back tomorrow and Wednesday for our Forever No. 1 reports on The Beach Boys’ second and third No. 1 hits, “Help Me Rhonda” and “Good Vibrations.”