Twenty One Pilots earn their 14th No. 1 on Billboard’s Alternative Airplay chart as “Drag Path” rises two spots to lead the ranking dated May 2. The song, written by the duo’s Tyler Joseph, gained by 10% in plays at the format April 17-23, according to Luminate.

Related

The act ties Linkin Park for the second-most No. 1s in the chart’s history, which dates to September 1988. Red Hot Chili Peppers lead all acts with 15.

“Drag Path” marks the pair’s third Alternative Airplay No. 1 in less than a year, following “City Walls,” which led in December, and “The Contract,” which reached the summit in August. The act first led with “Stressed Out” in 2015.

The new leader is from Twenty One Pilots’ eighth studio album, Breach, which debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard 200 last September. The song was not on the standard tracklist, first appearing as an exclusive bonus track on the limited-time Breach: Digital Remains release before gaining traction online. It was later issued to streaming services after going viral on TikTok, with a shorter edit released for the wider rollout.

Since debuting on Alternative Airplay in 2013 with “Holding on to You,” which peaked at No. 10, Twenty One Pilots have charted 24 entries, 21 of which have reached the top 10.

Artists with 10 or more Alternative Airplay No. 1s:

  • 15, Red Hot Chili Peppers
  • 14, Linkin Park
  • 14, Twenty One Pilots
  • 13, Cage the Elephant
  • 13, Green Day
  • 12, Foo Fighters

The Black Keys, U2 and Weezer lead the next closest tier with eight No. 1s each.


Billboard VIP Pass

Ahead of its 40th anniversary, Capital One City Parks Foundation SummerStage revealed its 2026 lineup on Tuesday (April 28). On June 10, Grammy winner Ledisi, in association with Blue Note Jazz Festival, will open the season with a set that salutes jazz icon Dinah Washington—fitting enough, given that the inaugural SummerStage concert was delivered by Sun Ra, another jazz legend, albeit one of a very different bent. (The Sun Ra Arkestra began the annual NYC concert tradition June 1986 in Central Park.)

The 2026 SummerStage lineup, which offers free concerts across all five boroughs, includes a number of legendary artists, familiar hitmakers and buzzing newcomers from a variety of genres: Laurie Anderson (who is somehow making her SummerStage debut despite being an integral part of the NYC art scene for longer than SummerStage has existed), Angélique Kidjo, Mavis Staples, De La Soul, Spoon, Andrew Bird, Bilal, MIKE’s Young World with Max B, Julieta Venegas, Edem, Black Country, New Road, Horsegirl, SHABAKA, Kokoroko, Trueno, Luedji Luna ft. Liniker, Shaggy, WayV, Charlie Aponte and more.

You can check out the full lineup (so far) here, but here are a few shows worth special mention. Longtime SummerStage mainstay Funk Flex taps Jon B. for the Birthday R&B Picnic on Central Park on Aug. 7, then hosts a night of house/freestyle and hip-hop with Crystal Waters, Cynthia and Frankie Cutlass on Staten Island on Aug. 8. He’s also presenting a Hip-Hop Appreciation Park Jam in the Bronx July 31 with Doug E. Fresh. One day earlier on July 30, a celebration of the wildly influential breakbeat compilation series Ultimate Breaks and Beats hits Central Park to celebrate its 40th anniversary, led by the series’ co-founder Breakbeat Lou and featuring Lord Finesse, Diamond D, Grand Puba and Sadat X.

As per usual, the 2026 SummerStage season includes ticketed benefit shows to help fund the free performances, including: The Martinez Brothers (June 13); Elderbrook (June 20); a showcase for British trance label Anjunadeep (July 18); Blues Traveler with Gin Blossoms and Spin Doctors (Aug. 15); Simple Plan with 3OH!3 and Bowling for Soup (Aug. 19); The Marcus King Band (Sept. 12); Charley Crockett (Oct. 1); and more artists, with additional names yet to be announced.

“Forty years ago, I had a simple idea: that world-class music and performing arts belonged to everyone, not just those who could afford a ticket. Four decades later, I’m genuinely moved by what SummerStage has meant to our city and what we helped build together with our fans,” said Joe Killian, SummerStage founder and executive producer (1986-1993) and City Parks Foundation board member.

“It is such a thrill to be presenting our 40th season lineup, while also celebrating four decades of showcasing iconic artists and dynamic new voices from around the world,” said Erika Elliott, executive artistic director of SummerStage. “We are extremely proud of SummerStage’s place in NYC music history and of championing artists across all genres, whether its local NYC icons or major stars from across the globe. This summer’s performances in each borough will continue to provide platforms for artists to share their creativity with the diverse communities that make up our city and further build our legacy.”

“I am thrilled to announce our 2026 SummerStage lineup and mark our momentous 40th anniversary,” said Heather Lubov, executive director of City Parks Foundation. “This season’s exceptional mix of artists truly embodies why SummerStage has become such a beloved music destination for the past four decades, and reflects our city’s rich cultural diversity. We are excited to continue the tradition of bringing memorable live performances to NYC’s parks and celebrating our communities.”

Courtesy DCKNews

Taylor Swift doesn’t do a lot of lengthy video interviews, but in conjunction with The New York Times naming her as one of America’s greatest living songwriters, the pop star opened up on camera about her life, career and fanbase as they relate to her craft.

The newspaper rolled out its 30 Greatest Living American Songwriters roundup on Monday (April 27), including the 14-time Grammy winner among icons such as Dolly Parton, Bob Dylan and Bruce Springsteen, as well as fellow modern superstars like Jay-Z, Bad Bunny and Kendrick Lamar. With 276 entries on the Billboard Hot 100 — more than any other artist aside from Drake — and 14 No. 1s, it’s no wonder why she made the list, which was narrowed down by editors after reviewing ballots submitted by hundreds of music experts.

“We considered all sorts of remarkable songwriters — including lots of weird geniuses and under-loved influences,” reads a separate NYT article about its methodology. “But we were drawn back toward the beating-heart story of American song, to people whose music has reverberated through private worlds and across the public square, echoing through headphones, radios, grocery-store aisles, TikTok videos and school-gym ceremonies, blasting out of karaoke machines, club speakers and the windows of passing cars.”

Swift’s music objectively ticks all those boxes, which has allowed her to stay on top of the pop-culture heap for nearly two decades and go down in history as one of the best-selling artists of all time. But it’s also opened her up to a lot of questions about her work — What inspires her? How is she as a collaborator? Does she dislike when people analyze her music for clues about her personal life? — and in her conversation with the paper, she addressed many of them.

Below, see Billboard‘s biggest takeaways from the hitmaker’s Greatest Living American Songwriters interview.


Billboard VIP Pass

The legendary Estadio 3 de Marzo — which for 55 years served as the venue for some of the most iconic moments in sports and music in the Mexican state of Jalisco — will write a new chapter as it transforms into the Coliseo GNP Seguros: a renovated venue centered on live entertainment, featuring modernized infrastructure and a fan-focused experience, Ocesa announced on Tuesday (April 28).

Related

According to the promoter, the renovation of the iconic venue — which will open its doors this coming August and accommodate up to 30,000 attendees — is the result of a historic investment and a partnership between OCESA, GNP Seguros and the Autonomous University of Guadalajara.

This project “redefines the way live entertainment is experienced, positioning Jalisco as a strategic hub within the global entertainment circuit,” the company said in a press release.

The Coliseo GNP Seguros will kick off this new chapter with an extensive artistic and cultural lineup, featuring performances by stars such as Alejandro Sanz and Yuridia, as well as a powerhouse trio of major ska bands — Auténticos Decadentes, Caligaris and Panteón Rococó — who will be performing together for the first time.

The renovation encompasses both structural and operational changes. One of the most significant is the elimination of unnumbered zones: the entire stadium will now feature assigned seating, in addition to new areas such as the Diamond Stand, designed to offer an experience closer to the stage. The redesign also includes a new entrance plaza, expanded tunnels, improved accessibility, and a renovation of the roof and façade — elements intended to facilitate movement and enhance audience comfort.

“The venue will also feature a digital screen system — including a perimeter LED ring and strategic visual communication points — that enhances the experience inside the stadium,” Ocesa added.

For decades, the Estadio 3 de Marzo served as the setting for some of the most significant moments in sports and music in Guadalajara, hosting international artists such as Luis Miguel, Shakira, Karol G, Linkin Park, Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga, while solidifying its status as a key venue within Mexico’s entertainment circuit.

“In this new phase, it will maintain its sporting vocation, coexisting with a world-class entertainment offering,” Ocesa said. Last year, Live Nation increased its stake to 75% in the operations of the Mexican company Ocesa and Ticketmaster Mexico.


Billboard VIP Pass

AI attribution is the key to unlocking the limitless opportunities available in a music world that seeks to embrace generative AI technology. It can calm artists’ fears around compensation and unauthorized use. It can reduce litigation risk and increase profits for platforms that provide generative AI music products. And it can give rights owners more certainty on license scope, plus more nuanced and enhanced revenue shares. In short, if designed and deployed the right way, AI attribution can be a boon to the entire generative AI music ecosystem.

What is AI Attribution in the Music Industry?

In the context of generative AI and music, attribution refers to the process of attempting to trace which training inputs contributed to a given AI-generated output (and in some cases, how much each input contributed).

Related

For artists, copyright owners and platforms alike, attribution offers what the industry has demanded since the early days of generative AI: transparency. By shining a light into what was once a black box, attribution gives copyright owners visibility into whether and how their works are being used by AI systems.

It also creates the potential for more customized compensation opportunities. Where licensing arrangements exist today, they generally take the form of upfront fees or revenue-sharing models that are not tied to the actual contribution of any specific work. Attribution, in theory, changes that calculus by enabling compensation to be linked to traceable impact.

The potential upside is industry-wide. For AI developers, attribution could make licensing discussions less contentious. It is much easier to negotiate with artists, labels and publishers when there is a credible way to offer visibility into how works are used and how value is tracked. More transparent systems could also lend greater comfort to investors mindful of the legal exposure of generative AI platforms in today’s climate. Plus, this creates an opportunity to have more targeted data about what music fans and music creators find most useful in generative AI products.

Importantly, attribution offers more legitimacy. Platforms can point to sourcing and compensation mechanisms that are more trustworthy and easier to build on. Music fans and creators, and copyright owners, are more likely to partner with or use generative AI music platforms if they believe the underlying system can explain where the value came from and whether the relevant rights were compensated.

Related

The Attribution Landscape Today

In recent years, a range of technical methods have been proposed to investigate whether particular training materials may have influenced a given AI-generated output. Some methods compare generated outputs to candidate training materials in a separate database to identify similarity or proximity. Other methods examine the AI model itself, using signals from the model’s parameters to estimate whether, and to what extent, particular training materials contributed to a given output. Watermarking training content is another method, where the presence of a watermark in the output has been suggested to indicate which specific training materials contributed to it.

At present, however, none of these methods yield answers about influence with certainty. Some rely on probabilities, while others may find correlations, which does not necessarily mean causation. Often the results depend on underlying assumptions and, in some cases, on access to technical information about the AI model that may not be available in practice. Some options rely on significant computing power, which can be expensive.

Because current attribution methods carry various limitations, it may take time before any single approach is widely adopted across the industry, or before effective hybrid approaches that combine the best of these methods emerge. That doesn’t mean that these technologies shouldn’t be used. As long as everyone understands the limitations, the benefits of these technologies merit development because the better they get, the better the commercial opportunities will be in the music space. And the technology won’t improve at the pace users will expect without actually using them, perhaps in limited data environments (“sandboxes”) to mitigate risk. In the meantime, as these technologies evolve, several questions matter from a commercial contracting perspective.

Related

Where the Rubber Meets the Road: Questions Worth Asking in Your AI Music Deals

Capability – Before the attribution data is used to support payment or other rights-sensitive decisions, the parties should first ask: Is the attribution system capable of identifying the kind of influence you intend to compensate? This is important to ask because, in practice, an attribution tool’s capabilities (and its limitations) become part of the parties’ commercial bargain. Consider a hip-hop producer who licenses his catalog to an AI platform under an agreement intended to compensate him when the model draws on his unique production style. The model later generates a track in a new genre that incorporates his distinctive production signatures, but the output sounds nothing like any particular recording in the producer’s catalog. An attribution tool that looks for close resemblance to recordings in a reference database may return no close match to the producer’s catalog (or low confidence), potentially leaving his contribution uncompensated despite the parties’ intent to the contrary.

Auditability – If attribution data will inform payments to copyright owners, there should be visibility into how the system works and how the results are produced. What documentation exists to describe the attribution methodology? Are independent audits permitted or even possible with respect to these technologies?

Liability – Current attribution technologies are still developing and, like any technology, are not immune from error. If the attribution system over-credits, under-credits, or fails to trace the influence or credit at all, what are the consequences? Who should bear the cost of investigation and resolving these claims? Is there a process for dispute?

Related

Data ownership – the data generated about how often each work in a training set influenced an output, in what context, to what degree, and other considerations could have secondary value for everyone in this ecosystem. The data can reveal which training content is commercially relevant or stylistically influential, which may be useful for A&R professionals in picking which artists and songwriters to sign; copyright owners and generative AI music platform developers in what content should be most valued in licensing; and to anyone interested in learning more about what music fans and creators find most relevant in their worlds. Who owns this attribution data and any derived analytics? Can this attribution data be leveraged for other purposes?

While AI attribution technology may feel like a nuts-and-bolts topic, it is worthwhile for the various music and AI stakeholders, creators and technologists alike to engage with its development and work cooperatively to maximize its efficacy. Implementation of reliable attribution technology could be a boon to the entire music and AI ecosystem, helping the commercialization market mature and bringing both more certainty and higher revenues to its constituents.

Adrian Perry is a partner at global law firm Covington & Burling, co-chair of its Entertainment and Media Industry group, and a driving force behind the firm’s artificial intelligence transactional and advisory work.

Nicole Canales is an associate at Covington & Burling who advises on transactional matters across the firm’s technology and music industry practices.


Billboard VIP Pass

Unbound Japan is a new interview series spotlighting entertainment industry professionals who have built careers on the international stage. For its inaugural installment, Billboard Japan spoke with Ryota Takaji, a professional dancer based in Los Angeles. Having danced since childhood, Takaji recently appeared as one of Bad Bunny’s dancers at the Super Bowl halftime show in February. He opened up about how he made his way to the world of U.S. entertainment and what keeps him going as a working dancer there.

When and how did you start dancing?

I don’t remember it clearly because I was so young, but apparently when I was around 5 I used to imitate idol performers I’d see dancing on TV. My mother happened to know someone whose daughter was taking dance classes, and we were invited to her recital. When we went, I thought, “I want to do that too,” and that’s how I started. Back then, I looked up to popular acts on TV like SMAP and Morning Musume.

When did your interest start to shift from Japanese artists to dancers overseas?

There was a teacher I really admired from elementary school, and that teacher got deeply influenced by a dancer when she went to the U.S. I attended a workshop this dancer held in Osaka, where I’m from, and that was my first real encounter with someone from outside Japan. Around the time I was in junior high school, more and more people started posting class footage on YouTube. Watching those videos, I kept thinking how cool it was, how people from where it all originates are just on another level. That’s when my interest really started to grow. By high school, whenever a foreign dancer came to Japan to teach, I was taking overnight buses to Tokyo by myself and going to their classes once or twice a month. The dancers I met there had a huge impact on me.

So you were getting information from abroad through the internet early on.

I think it was around that time that Japanese people making names for themselves overseas were gradually starting to emerge. I looked up to people like s**t kingz and Koharu Sugawara, who were making it internationally. From there I got curious about the dancers from other countries that I was seeing in class videos and started researching them. From high school onward, I’d say my switch had fully flipped toward going abroad. It was basically all I had my sights on.

When did you decide you wanted to go to the U.S.?

I always knew that once I graduated high school, I had to get to the U.S., at least once. So the first time I went was right after graduation. I was only there for two months, taking classes from people I admired and essentially doing a dance-only study abroad stint. But two months felt nowhere near enough to absorb what I needed. I figured I had to go for a full year or more next time, so I started saving money and preparing. I went back when I was around twenty, this time attending language school while also dancing, for about two years.

But being a student meant I couldn’t work, and I realized I’d need a visa to actually work as a dancer over there. The standard route to getting that visa is to build a career outside the U.S. and submit that track record as evidence. So I returned to Japan and moved to Tokyo to establish myself properly, but that coincided with the COVID lockdown. Live performances were off the table, and I worked within those limitations which made me think a lot about my future. Through all of that, I came to the conclusion that I still wanted to see what I could achieve in U.S., so I got the visa and came back around the end of 2022.

When you’re pushing toward a goal and obstacles inevitably come up, how did you deal with them?

The people around me were a huge help. But to be honest… High School Musical was really popular right around that time. I’d watched it and was caught up in this image of American life, so I was only seeing the exciting parts.lol

But there were plenty of practical problems, the everyday hurdles you simply can’t survive without clearing, like opening a bank account. I had no choice but to solve them. By stumbling through it all, I gradually figured out how to handle things.

Which artists have you’ve worked with so far?

I’ve danced for Kyary Pamyu Pamyu and Fujii Kaze, the Paralympic closing ceremony, and Amazon Prime’s The Masked Singer, where I was one of the exclusive dancers on the show. During my time in Tokyo, a lot of my work was music videos and commercials because of the COVID pandemic. Since coming to the U.S., I’ve done music videos for artists like Eric Nam, and I also do some behind-the-scenes work that’s common in K-pop called skeleton crew work, where you dance in videos that help artists learn choreography.

In terms of working in Japan, I was so honored I got to work with Fujii Kaze. I did his music video and danced at his stadium concert. I’d actually been listening to his music a little before that, and had been hoping I’d get to work with him someday. It was a dream come true when it actually happened. I was overwhelmed.

Most recently, you danced for Bad Bunny at the Super Bowl halftime show, held February 9th in Santa Clara, California.

It’s one of the biggest shows in America and every dancer’s dream. I couldn’t be more proud to be a part of it and it really left a huge impact in my heart.

How did it come about?

It was an audition. This applies to any performing stint, but physical appearance and proportions matter enormously in this industry. So I honestly don’t know exactly how they selected the dancers for this halftime show. A massive number of people came to audition. I was chosen through whatever process they used to narrow things down, and I genuinely feel like it was all about the timing.

I imagine how hard it is just waiting for that time to come.

Opportunities come at different times for everyone. I kept up my daily training while waiting for my moment. The announcement that Bad Bunny would perform at the Super Bowl came in the fall of last year. He’s from Puerto Rico, so I was thinking it would be great if this became a stage where Latin and Hispanic people could shine. Given the political climate, with so much going on right now, I was hoping it would be a performance that made those people happy, a show that featured a lot of them. I was thinking about it almost like it was happening outside of the world. So the idea that I could actually be part of it never even crossed my mind.

When I got the email for the audition, it didn’t say “Super Bowl”, but I heard through word of mouth what it was actually for and thought, “I have to give everything I’ve got.” I passed one round, got called back for another, and it went from there. I gave it everything I had to make it through, of course, but I didn’t do anything particularly different from usual. Honestly, I think it really was just timing and luck.

You were the only Japanese dancer in Bad Bunny’s halftime show. Do you find it difficult to succeed as an Asian dancer based in the U.S.?

Very much so. Like a lot of times, as a male dancer you have to be tall to even get invited to auditions. Oftentimes there are height restrictions, so you don’t even get a chance. I’m a small guy, so it’s really hard keeping up alongside big and buff American dancers. On top of that, Japanese people tend to be shy. I’m no exception and have a very Japanese personality, so I still struggle with putting myself forward and pitching myself assertively. There were times where I couldn’t find the courage to step up even though I knew it was the only way to seize an opportunity, and it really got me down.

If you could offer advice to young people who want to make it on the world stage, what would you say?

Observe yourself, not necessarily every single day but consistently, and keep improving little by little without settling for where you are. I’ve seen a lot of people got burnt out and decide to quit by being too hard on themselves, so what matters is taking care of yourself while staying honest with yourself, and just keep repeating that cycle of getting a little better at a time. Like I said, timing and opportunities are completely different for each person. You have to believe your moment will come and just keep building toward it. Getting a chance early doesn’t necessarily mean everything, since you might get satisfied and stop working hard. No matter when the opportunity comes, what it always comes down to is the work you put in every day. I think all you can do is to keep growing in a gradual way like that.

Have there been times when you’ve struggled personally, watching fellow Japanese dancers find success while you were still waiting for yours?

Of course, that still happens all the time even now. In the age of social media, you’re constantly seeing people at their best, and that can really bring you down. But that’s just how it is. Something I’ve come to understand a little more recently is that everyone has a different relationship with social media and with friends in the same field. The distance that feels comfortable is different for each person. All you can do is look inward and keep figuring out what’s right for you.

Is there anything you’d like to take on going forward?

I love creating performances and shows, so I’d like to gradually get into choreography and direction, drawing on what I’ve experienced and seen. I’d especially love to do that kind of work in Japan. I’d be so happy if I could contribute the things I’ve gained through training and building my career in the U.S. as a small positive impact on Japanese entertainment. Alongside my dreams as a dancer, I want to start pursuing that goal as well.

This interview by Sakika Kumagai first appeared on Billboard Japan

A decade after Cinq Music bought much of T.I.’s recorded music catalog, the rapper is suing the label over accusations that it has refused to honor a contract promising to let him to buy back those same masters at a cheap price.

Cinq bought T.I.’s Atlantic Records-era catalog in a splashy 2017 deal, including chart-topping albums King, T.I. vs. TIP and Paper Trail. But he says he only greenlit that deal because Cinq gave him an option to buy back the records later on “very favorable” terms.

Related

Now, in a new lawsuit obtained and first reported by Billboard, the “Bring Em Out” star (Clifford Joseph Harris) says Cinq is violating that part of the agreement after he invoked it — demanding a price nearly $50 million higher than what he actually owes.

“Cinq regretted that it had agreed to the [option terms], and, therefore … did everything it could to frustrate plaintiffs’ efforts to complete the purchase,” writes T.I.’s lawyer Robert Jacobs of the law firm Manatt Phelps & Phillips.

After T.I. exercised his option in 2024, he claims Cinq tried to “artificially inflate” the price by warping the formula that the company itself wrote back in 2017: “Using these tactics Cinq sought to extract a purchase price from plaintiffs that was nearly 20 times higher than the price mandated by the parties’ agreed-upon formula.”

Rather than the maximum of $3 million that T.I. says he should pay for his albums under the original deal, he claims Cinq “manipulated” the numbers and came back with the “significantly overstated purchase price” of $52 million.

A spokesperson for Cinq did not immediately return a request for comment on Tuesday. An attorney for T.I. also did not return a request for comment. Atlantic is not named in the lawsuit nor accused of any wrongdoing.

After releasing his 2001 debut on Arista, T.I. spent the prime of his career at Atlantic, releasing seven studio albums that included a slew of Hot 100 top 10 songs. His 2008 Paper Trail included two No. 1s (“Whatever You Like” and “Live Your Life” feat. Rihanna) as well a third track (“Dead and Gone”) that reached No. 2.

In 2017, Cinq made a splash by buying the recorded music rights to all those albums from Atlantic. “Through artists like T.I, we’re showing Cinq is a company that artists of all sizes can rely on to maximize the value of their intellectual property,” Cinq president Barry Daffurn said at the time.

Though not always strictly required, such catalog deals work better with cooperation and consent from the artist — and T.I. says in his new lawsuit that Cinq sought such approval by offering him the buy-back provision. He claims it was “one of the principal reasons” that he agreed to consent to the sale.

The option allegedly required the label to sell him the masters at a price determined by a set formula: Cinq’s gross receipts from May 2023 to April 2024, minus any royalty compensation owed to T.I. and his company, multiplied by 12. But crucially, T.I. says it explicitly excluded Cinq’s revenue from digital streaming providers like Spotify.

That’s a surprising carve-out in the modern music business, and one that would obviously drive down the sale price. But T.I.’s lawsuit says that Cinq itself wrote the agreement to included that provision, and cannot back out now simply because it regrets the terms.

“Because it was common knowledge when the parties entered into the Cinq agreement in 2017 that audio streaming and video streaming via the DSPs had become the main driver of music industry growth and revenues, Cinq had ample reason to know then that the [streaming] exclusion would have a significant impact on the [price].”

When T.I. exercised the buy-back option, he says Cinq quickly realized that the formula would “yield a low purchase price because of the limited revenue streams it included.” So, he says, the label simply included that streaming revenue anyway, as well as other excluded sources of income like foreign revenue. “Cinq’s departure from the contractual definition of Gross Receipts resulted in an exaggerated and inaccurate revenue-side starting point.”

He claims Cinq also fudged the numbers when it came to deducting his royalties, doing so as part of an overall effort to “artificially maximize” the price he’d have to pay. His lawyers say the label clearly knew the terms of the deal, but chose to violate them because it was hoping to “trigger a negotiation” that would net a better price.


Billboard VIP Pass

Rising Maryland rapper HavinMotion (born Dwayne Omar Isaacs, Jr.), 22, was shot and killed in Washington, D.C. on Thursday (April 23). According to a press release from the Washington Metropolitan Police Department from Friday, officers responded at 10:11 p.m. to reports of a shooting and when they arrived on the scene they observed an “adult male victim who was unconscious and not breathing, suffering from apparent gunshot wounds.”

DC Fire and EMS also responded an despite lifesaving efforts, said Issacs succumbed to his injuries at the scene. The release confirmed that the victim was Upper Marlboro, Maryland resident Isaacs, whose name matches that of the MC who last month released a pair of songs on his YouTube channel, a remix of Kehlani’s “Folded” and the distorted trap anthem “Druggin N’ Thuggin”; the video for the latter opens with a disclaimer reading: “All weapons in this video are AI-generated for the purpose of entertainment.”

According to Complex, D.C.’s Chief Medical Examiner said the rapper’s manner of death was “multiple gunshot wounds” and the manner of death was tagged as “homicide.”

MPD is offering a $25,000 reward for anyone with information leading to an arrest in the case. A spokesperson for the police department told Billboard on Tuesday morning (April 28) that the investigation into the shooting is ongoing and that there is currently no information on suspects or motive.

HavinMotion’s Spotify page has 113,062 monthly listeners and 28,100 followers. Starting with his 2002 single “iM SAD,” the rapper released a string of singles, EPs and albums, including the 2022 EPs Stuck Ina Mix and Lost Files, followed by the 2023 EPs Lost Files 2, 100 Day Run and Bang Music, the 2024 albums Motion, Trappin In Beverley and Sorry Ma, the 2025 LPs Romantic Trapper, F–k You Pay Me and Rich Junkie, this year’s 16-track How Life Been album and a string of singles.

Watch HavinMotion’s “Folded” remix video below.


Billboard VIP Pass

Jennifer Lopez and David Guetta’s “Save Me Tonight” surges from No. 5 to No. 1 on Billboard’s Dance/Mix Show Airplay chart dated May 2, 2026, thanks to a 31% increase in plays among 24/7 dance reporters and pop stations’ mix show hours April 17-23, according to Luminate.

Lopez lands her second No. 1 on the chart, after “On the Floor,” featuring Pitbull, in April 2011. The track was a crossover smash, reaching No. 3 on the Billboard Hot 100, as well as No. 1 on Latin Pop Airplay, No. 2 on Latin Airplay, No. 5 on Pop Airplay and Tropical Airplay and No. 10 on Rhythmic Airplay.

Lopez has earned No. 1s on 10 of Billboard’s 25 radio charts: Pop, Rhythmic, R&B/Hip-Hop, Mainstream R&B/Hip-Hop, Dance/Mix Show, Latin, Latin Pop, Latin Rhythm, Tropical and the all-format Radio Songs.

As for Guetta, the DJ scores his record-extending 21st Dance/Mix Show Airplay No. 1, and his first of 2026. He has now earned new No. 1s on the chart in a record eight consecutive calendar years.

Here’s an updated look at the artists with the most leaders on the chart, which launched in 2003:

  • 21, David Guetta
  • 18, Calvin Harris
  • 12, Rihanna
  • 10, The Chainsmokers
  • 9, Ellie Goulding
  • 8, ILLENIUM
  • 7, Anabel Englund
  • 7, Madonna
  • 7, Tiësto
  • 6, Kaskade
  • 6, Dua Lipa

“I cannot believe it,” Lopez shared in an Instagram Reel Monday (April 27) upon learning that “Save Me Tonight” hit No. 1. “Thank you guys so much. Go out there, dance this summer and have the best time. That’s why I made this record.”


Billboard VIP Pass

On this week’s Hot 100 show, we dive deep into the biggest chart movements with special guest Bebe Rexha discussing her independent era with “New Religion” and brand new single “Hysteria.” Bebe Rexha opens up about her “Dirty Blonde” era and filming 13 music videos in 3 days,Olivia Rodrigo debuts at No. 1 with “Drop Dead,” her fourth consecutive #1 debut, Ella Langley’s “Choose Texas” continued chart dominance, Kehlani’s “Folded” holds strong in the top 10 alongside her new self-titled album, Justin Bieber’s Coachella effect sends catalog tracks soaring globally, and more.

Plus, exclusive insights on upcoming Billboard Women in Music performances and festival season highlights from Coachella and Stagecoach!

Bebe Rexha: Hey everyone, it’s Bebe Rexha and you’re watching The Hot 100 Show. 

Tetris Kelly: Hey, what’s up and welcome to another episode of The Hot 100 Show. That’s right, we got my girl Bebe Rexha on today and of course, all your charts and the New York team to discuss it. So let’s jump into numbers 10 through eight. Down to 10 is “Folded.” As is “Golden” t oNo. 9. Coachella brings” Daisies” back to eight. That’s the beginning of our charts. New York, what do you guys think? 

Xander Zellner: All right, well, we gotta talk about Bieber, right? I- You were just at Coachella.

Delisa Shannon: I was at Coachella but then we also have to talk about “Folded” and we’ve gotta talk about “Golden” because I’m gonna get to see them live in a few days. 

Xander Zellner: Wait, when? For WIM. 

Trevor Anderson: Oh my god, for, uh, of course, yes. 

Xander Zellner: Oh, right. ‘Kpop Demon Hunters’ are Women of the Year. 

Delisa Shannon: This week, yes. Are Women of the Year, making history as the first group to obtain the honor of Women of the Year. Women, not just Woman, women. So- We love plurals. We love plurals around this camp.

Keep watching for more!